Trying AGAIN to get a Subject change to be more reflective of the PRESENT
discussion...remember folks...it IS possible to change the Subject.
Another facet is for the station who does NOT think the QSO is a
dupe...likely it was a mis-entry due to bad typing, bad conditions,
QRM...something like that so, if somebody told me we HAD already worked
(i.e. it was a DUPE) and my logging program said we had NOT, I would actualy
WELCOME the other station indicating to me the time or some info about the
previous QSO that was in THEIR log (but not in mine)...a hot button for a
"notes" screen that could pop up where I could make a quick entry and that
would be linked to the "replacement" QSO would be a nice feature in a
logging program.
Of course I still log on paper (still *my* "favorite" logging program) and
enter into Excel, post contest, to make my Cabrillo formatted "QSO:" lines.
73, JK
>From: KA2AEV@aol.com
>To: VHFcontesting@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] contest logging software: current fave?
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 18:31:27 EDT
>
>
>This is true, I have Operated with Warren at many stations
>and the main thing to prevent is the loss of points for your side
>73 de Mike
>KA2AEV
>
>
>
>In a message dated 7/3/2006 3:53:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>n2nk@optonline.net writes:
>
>It takes far less time to log a dupe then it does to explain to them
>that they are a dupe. We have a standing rule at all the M/M
>operations I've been part of... Log ALL Dupes! It HURTS nothing, and
>might prevent a penalty if that dupe DOES NOT have YOU in their log!
>
>73
>Warren - K2BM
>Member of The N2NK Normanoch VHF contest club
>
>
>At 03:49 PM 7/3/2006, Jim Worsham wrote:
> >I have heard several people make this comment and I just have to ask,
>Why
> >would you want to log a dupe?
> >
> >73
> >Jim, W4KXY
>
>
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|