Since "electronically" submitted logs (Cabrillo format) are NOT penalized
for dupes, might it just be easier to just log the "dupe," rather than try
to figure out what the dupe was.
After all, it *might* have a mis-copy/mis-entry of the initial QSO by one of
the stations, so, when the station that entered the initial QSO correctly
reports it IS a dupe...but, the station that mis-copied/mis-entered thinks
it is not...why not just LOG it instead of arguing about it?
The station that initially mis-copied or mis-entered should get a penalty
but I would hope that the station that copied correctly would NOT be
penalized...can someone more familiar with what the robots/log-checking
programs do comment on whether or not such logic is implemented?
73, JK
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|