VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives

To: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives
From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:53:31 -0700
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:35:03PM -0700, Tree Tyree N6TR wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:22:27AM -0400, Bill Katt wrote:
> 
> > Sure, but it doesn't change my questions...  I honestly don't see what
> > the problem is with borrowing equipment, or lending, or helping, or
> > using underused bands, or any of the other staples of the arguments
> > defining persons as 'captive rovers'.  And it doesn't change the
> > imagery I see when I hear the term either...
> 
> Which do you think is more healthy for the contest:
> 
> 1. Equiping a rover that ends up only working W2SZ.
> 
> 2. Equiping a rover that works W2SZ and a bunch of other stations?

# 2



-- 
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>