On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:22:27AM -0400, Bill Katt wrote:
> Sure, but it doesn't change my questions... I honestly don't see what
> the problem is with borrowing equipment, or lending, or helping, or
> using underused bands, or any of the other staples of the arguments
> defining persons as 'captive rovers'. And it doesn't change the
> imagery I see when I hear the term either...
Which do you think is more healthy for the contest:
1. Equiping a rover that ends up only working W2SZ.
2. Equiping a rover that works W2SZ and a bunch of other stations?
Tree
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
|