Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited]

[Ev Tupis <w2ev@arrl.net>]

Lee Hiers wrote:
> > "Once operation has ceased, the same grid may not be re-activated by the 
> > same moving station in the same contest.  Operation in a previous grid 
> > is considered 'ceased' as soon as a single contact is made from a new grid."
> >
> > No ambiguity.  Easily understood.  Easily policed.

> Here in the southeast, with no enhanced propagation, I 
> might decide that I want to move back and forth from one 
> grid to another in less than 4/8/12 hours.
>
> And what if I decide to take the same route both days?  

You should consider a different strategy.  This one isn't allowed under 
this proposal (and neither is grid circling).

> Both are perfectly legitimate activities.  

Legitimacy isn't the issue.  There are many legitimate activities that 
the rules prohibit.  In example: a multiop may QSO their own operators 
above 2.3GHz, yet qso's below 2.3ghz are certainly as legit...yet they 
are prohibited.

Ev, W2EV



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting