To: | <VHFcontesting@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited |
From: | John K9IJ <k9ij@vx5.com> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:18:27 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
At 09:40 PM 2/20/2004 -0500, David Hinton wrote:
John, I totally disagree. You are making an assumption here that the new entry level participant is going to start on many bands immediately and be competitive immediately and if they're not they aren't going to be interested at all. Based on that assumption, then we should eliminate all the bands except maybe Six and Two because the beginning contester isn't going to likely be on 220Mhz or 432/450 either. The extra points for 2.3G and higher bands are there specifically to encourage more participation on those bands. WE continue to 'need' to encourage participation on those bands. A MUCH better solution to encourage new participation and allow them to become competitive sooner would be to add a 'limited single' category. John - K9IJ David - John Rice K9IJ k9ij@vx5.com Webmaster, Network Admin, Janitor http://www.k9ij.com http://www.suhfars.org http://www.vx5.com/~teampf
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposal..., Ev Tupis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Circling Solution [was: ARRL VHF+ contestproposals: input invited], Ev Tupis |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited, David Hinton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited, John K9IJ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |