VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps[was:Asuggestionfor

To: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>, vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps[was:Asuggestionfor ERP-based Entry Classes]
From: Scott Pederson <spederson@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:41:48 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
> I consider both positions to enter in and to be relevant.  We are in
> danger of losing a lot of frequencies because vested interests are
> throwing money around in hopes of making even more money on "their" new
> frequencies.  But I suppose anyone who never used a band above 1296 MHz
> and doesn't plan to ever use them couldn't care less if we lose those
> bands, and wouldn't and shouldn't complain if a REALLY big threat to our
> having that band comes along.

Not necessarily.  Even if I do not own equipment for one of these bands, I
would fight like hell to keep them, because it wouldn't be right for others to
lose out on their bands, their investments, and all the BST (Blood/Sweat/Tears)
they have invested.  I support the ARRL and their efforts to save the bands
from extinction, and I think most folks do.  It still comes down to money
though.

So, Exactly how much does a new Icom D-10 cost anyway?  Will seeing the sticker
cause me to have an embolism?  How many have they sold to-date?  Sometimes I
think these devices are like concept cars at the Detroit auto show.  Nice to
look at, but I'd never be able to afford one.

73,
SCott - KI5DR

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>