Tree said:
> > Maybe the thread could morph into a discussion of how "Captive Rover" is
> > defined?
>
> I think the real question is, are we okay people winning contests who have
> rovers who only work them?
Actually, this is a good point. Let's take it back one more step, though. Are
"Unique QSO's" (changing the term to better reflect the inquiry) a factor in
winning for anyone?
After all...this isn't just a "rover & multiop thing", is it? It's about any
station who (for one reason or another) shows up uniquely in another station's
log, right?
Ev, W2EV
|