| To: | <vhfcontesting@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [VHFcontesting] captive rovers = Red Herring - TYPO!!!!!! |
| From: | mcw1wjw9@optonline.net (Warren Walsh) |
| Date: | Wed Jul 30 17:11:52 2003 |
>I went to the list archive to see what Tree's original question was: > >http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/vhfcontesting/2003-July/002684.html > > > What would the consensus be if a rover was found to have made 60 > > QSOs with only one station. Would that be a problem? Or maybe 36 QSOs? > > > > What if there were a number of cases like that with a single station? > > > > Tree K7RAT > >I see mention from Tree of it being against the rule, and NO request for a >rule change. The above line should have been: I see "NO" mention from Tree of it being against the rule, and NO request for a rule change. Sorry for the typo! 73 Warren - K2BM |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [VHFcontesting] Rover Squared, Mike (KA5CVH) Urich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [VHFcontesting] captive rovers, Dan Evans |
| Previous by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] captive rovers = Red Herring, Warren J. Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | [VHFcontesting] captive rovers = Red Herring, Tree |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |