VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III

To: <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Rules Revisions - Part III
From: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:45 2003
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 08:05:15PM +0000, Bill Olson wrote:
> Hi Ken, Whew! Even if I agreed with you, which I don't, you don't answer my 
> final question. How do you enforce such a rule (rule to eliminate "captive" 
> rovers or so-called "manufactured" or good buddy QSO's)? Are you saying I 
> cannot *work who I want to* in the contest??  Or that I *can only go roving 
> on a route that will result in my best score*??? That really IS silly!

I don't know that I have the right answer.  I think a lot of these issues
haven't really received as much attention as they deserve yet, which is 
why it's good that they have come up.

A good place to start is to get people discussing contesting ethics and
what kind of competitions we really want to have.
 
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth E. Harker      "Vox Clamantis in Deserto"      kharker@cs.utexas.edu
University of Texas at Austin                   Amateur Radio Callsign: WM5R
Department of the Computer Sciences          Central Texas DX & Contest Club
Taylor Hall TAY 2.124                         Maintainer of Linux on Laptops
Austin, TX 78712-1188 USA            http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>