Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] vertical antenna feedpoint

To: john@kk9a.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] vertical antenna feedpoint
From: Mpridesti via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Mpridesti <mpridesti@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:47:49 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I would think having a DC ground (short element and inductor) is better for 
lightening and lower noise?

Regards,

Mark, K1RX


> On Mar 16, 2025, at 9:55 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> 
> I have been doing the opposite for decades.  I shorten the vertical slightly
> and use a hairpin coil to create a 50 ohm feedpoint.  Is one method better
> than the other?
> 
> John KK9A
> 
> 
> Jim Brown K9YC wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Once you've got a decent radial system, modeling software like NEC can 
> be used to design a simple way to match it to 50 or 75 ohm coax. The 
> concept is to increase the length of the antenna to move its resonance 
> down in frequency far enough that the resistive component of the 
> feedpoint impedance is 50 ohms, which makes it look inductive, which can 
> then be tuned out with a suitable capacitor. "Suitable" is this case 
> means of a type that has very low equivalent series resistance and a 
> sufficiently high voltage rating for the power you want to run. I simply 
> added enough length to the horizontal top of my 160M Tee to resonate it 
> down in the top portion of the AM broadcast band. I think I ended up 
> with capacitance in the range of 800-900 pF.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>