Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Long Term Connector Reliability

To: john@kk9a.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Long Term Connector Reliability
From: Raymond Benny <rayn6vr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:56:05 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have recently had two PL 259s and mating SO234s develop black crud at
their contact point. Rx was fine but on Tx a very high SWL resulted at the
rig.

In both cases I totally cleaned the male PL259 pin and SO234 female
receptacle, all is now fine.

My thought is that somehow a slight bit of moisture got inside and caused
arcing at the contact point. One connection lasted 12 years, the other abt
4 years. I have never put any grease or silicone on a PL259 or SO234.

Any thoughts on this internal arcing and how to prevent it?

Ray,
N6VR/W7YA


On Fri, Jul 22, 2022, 6:53 PM <john@kk9a.com> wrote:

> I have PL-259 and N connectors in use that are likely that old however none
> have stayed connected anywhere near that time frame. It is a good question
> but you cannot really complain about 25 years of service. I do not apply
> anything inside the connector and use quality connectors such as Amphenol
> and Andrew/Commscope.  W8JI has an article on grease and he states
> conductive grease should never be used in RF connectors.
> https://www.w8ji.com/dielectric_grease_vs_conductive_grease.htm
>
> GL
> John KK9A
>
>
>
> k7nj wrote:
>
> After over 25 years I've found some problems with connector conductivity at
> my 4X4NJ station.  I would be interested in knowing about experience that
> any of you may have with reliable connector conductivity for  similar time
> periods. This is primarily with PL-259, N-Type, and hard-line  connectors
> and associated adapters.  In particular, any experience with the following
> would be helpful:
>
> 1.       Nothing done to ensure conductivity
>
> 2.       Silicon grease
>
> 3.       Penetrox (or similar)
>
> 4.       "STUF" dielectric water proofing filler
>
> I'm interested mainly in actual experience that you have had after many
> years of using any of the above, or other, methods.  Please note that I'm
> not seeking methods for waterproofing - just in keeping the connection
> between mating surfaces highly conductive assuming waterproofing is good.
>
> 73, Riki K7NJ
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>