To: | towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] 160M vertical dipole ? |
From: | Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2022 09:46:47 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
No I don't have a 260 foot tower :-) but thinking about this crazy idea. My HDX590 tower is 90 feet fully extended. By attaching to the side of the mast 15 feet up I can have an attachment point at 105 feet. I am envisioning hanging a vertical dipole from the 105 feet point and running the top wire horizontally 82 feet sloping down to a 30 foot mast at the corner of my property. Likewise on the lower end of the dipole 9 feet high and going to the other corner of my property. This woud put the center of the dipole about 57 feet above the ground. I don't know how a dipole will work with the ends bent this way but maybe it would be more efficient than a vertical with a compromise radial field. An option might be to make two big boy loading coils and shorten the dipole. What do you think of this idea ? Am I off my rocker ? hihi Bob K6UJ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] FCP vs On ground.txt, Rob Atkinson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 160M vertical dipole ?, W7TMT - Patrick |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] FCP vs On ground.txt, Rob Atkinson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 160M vertical dipole ?, W7TMT - Patrick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |