Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square question

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square question
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:18:25 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 10/18/20 11:49 AM, kq2m@kq2m.com wrote:
Hi,

I will be rebuilding several 4-squares this season as well as restringing them 
in different trees due to Tornado damage (loss or destruction of many trees at 
my qth) during Tropical Storm Isaias on August 4th.  I have a few questions for 
which I would appreciate your guidance....

1) If I recall correctly, for purposes of focusing on Europe, ideally I would 
want to put the 4 elements in a box formation in the NE, SE, SW and NW 
directions relative to the middle of the array.  Is that correct?

That's an interesting question - phased arrays with small numbers of elements are really more of "reduce the wrong way" than "enhance the right way"

You kind of want to look at what directions you want to radiate to, or to suppress and figure it out that way.

An interesting thought that just occurred to me is that one could conceivably arrange 4 elements in a variety of ways, and optimize the various switched directions. Sort of like using HFTA to figure out antenna heights on a tower.



2) In the 4-square when I select the controller direction NE, I am effectively 
radiating broadside NE from the NW and SE elements.  Is that correct?

Direction is correct, but all 4 elements are contributing to the radiated signal.

A better way to think about 4 squares is that you are reducing the signal in unwanted directions - the beam is still fairly broad, but if properly set up, you get a significant reduction behind.

And, with all 4 radiating in the horizontal plane, the vertical beamwidth is narrower. A single vertical has a pretty broad vertical beam. 4 radiating together squishes that down.




3) In the past I had the bottom of the 4-square elements soldered to center 
conductor of the pin of an SO239 with the radials attached to each of the SO239 
screw holes, with the coax connector for the phasing line screwed onto the 
SO239.   (The choke was located below the PL259 on the phasing line) This 
worked well but I am trying to improve the design.


That sounds just fine as is.


If I were to terminate the bottom of the 4-square element by twisting it through and 
around one hole of the porcelain insulator and soldering it there, would I still be 
able to then solder a small wire from that connection to the center conductor pin of a 
SO239 with the radials attached to the SO239 screw holes as before?  My idea being 
that I can do that then I can use a piece of twine through the remaining porcelain 
insulator hole taped to the coax to provide additional physical support for the coax 
and radials – which will be helpful during ice storms.


Why not..

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>