To: | towertalk@contesting.com, rthorne@rthorne.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate |
From: | Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:52:21 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I agree with Steve that a middle bearing is not a good idea as aligning
3 bearings is very difficult and a middle bearing serves no purpose at
rotator rpms.
However, a middle support plate with a removable u-bolt or clamp, that can constrain the mast when you want to raise it to remove the rotator for service is a big help. Then the mast stays in column and doesn't overload/twist the top bearing. I also dislike the commercial "thrust" bearings. A block of black UHMW 3" thick bored for the mast od will never need servicing. Or stack up some HDPE kitchen cutting boards bored to fit, but they will need a coat of paint to protect them from UV. A rotator sized for a 4L full size 40m beam bearings can easily handle a 500lb thrust load. btw, my 40m 3L full size OWA weighs 350# plus 150# for the 3" x 0.25" wall alloy mast (a must for that size antenna). Grant KZ1W On 8/12/2014 8:04 AM, K7LXC--- via TowerTalk wrote: I'm working on getting the parts together for a Rohn 55g tower.? The Rohn 55g Bearing plate sure is expensive. I see two other possibilities.1 - Use the less expensive beacon plate and drill a hole for themast/bearing.2 - Use a rotor plate for the same purpose.I have no idea what the thickness of the Rohn bearing plate is asI plan on having a top bearing, an intermediate bearing then the rotor.compared to a beacon or rotor plate. I'm hoping to put up a full size 4 element 40m beam some day, so the system will need to handle a good 300+lbs. Hiya, Rich --The beacon plate is FB if you don't mind drilling it. As for an intermediate bearing, I'd discourage it. The plates are notprecision items and you'll just introduce bind into the system. Since all you're trying to do is capture the mast, put the rotator plate in the middle and skip the bearing - cheaper too. And the upper TB carries all the weight anyway so a middle bearing doesn't provide any structural help.Cheers & GL,Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate, john@kk9a.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate, Gary Jones |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate, K7LXC--- via TowerTalk |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate, Gary Jones |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |