Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Swinging Gate Side Mount - Additional Turning Radius?

To: <dick@ny1e.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Swinging Gate Side Mount - Additional Turning Radius?
From: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:41:12 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I think it all depends on what he is going to side mount. I had 160ft of 
Rohn 45 with 4 x 4 x 4, the two lower Hygain 204BAs were on those IIX mounts 
with Ham IVs. They were up for almost 10 years in all kinds of wind and 
weather in Northern Virginia. No problems whatsoever.  '73, Mike

-----Original Message----- 
From: Dick
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 8:54 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Swinging Gate Side Mount - Additional Turning Radius?

I don't like the swinging gate from IIX. Here's why.  The mounts only clamps
to ONE leg of the tower. You have to tighten the U bolts too tight to get
the mount not to turn. This puts way too much pressure onto the leg.

I like a design that I found here:
http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/sidemountusersguide1.htm  It Uses
angle iron to connect to two legs of the tower. There is no possibility of
slippage so you don't have to over tighten the U bolts.

Array solutions seems to be over engineered for most antennas, My homebrew 
one is a compromise:
http://www.ny1e.com/smount.jpg
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>