Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?
From: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:40:17 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 1/16/2012 5:19 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote:
> But contact pressure is sometimes more important then contact area.
> Some PL259 stuff is suffering from production and /or material quality more
> then type N
But that is a quality control issue, not something specific to the UHF 
type connector.

73

Roger (K8RI)
>
> 73
> Peter, DJ7WW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
> Sent: Montag, 16. Januar 2012 23:07
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?
>
> On 1/16/2012 9:48 AM, Frederick Vobbe wrote:
>> Never even considered running anything greater than 500 watts through a
>> PL259, to be honest with you.   I know they are rated for higher power,
>> but I've never considered them as being the right connector for the
>> application.
> Your opinion is not even slightly based on the laws of physics.  The
> contact area of the center conductor of a PL259 is MUCH larger than that
> for a BNC or N.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>