Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:19:40 +0100
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
But contact pressure is sometimes more important then contact area.
Some PL259 stuff is suffering from production and /or material quality more
then type N

73
Peter, DJ7WW

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Montag, 16. Januar 2012 23:07
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?

On 1/16/2012 9:48 AM, Frederick Vobbe wrote:
> Never even considered running anything greater than 500 watts through a
> PL259, to be honest with you.   I know they are rated for higher power,
> but I've never considered them as being the right connector for the
> application.

Your opinion is not even slightly based on the laws of physics.  The 
contact area of the center conductor of a PL259 is MUCH larger than that 
for a BNC or N.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>