To: | "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40/80m dipole |
From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:02:37 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Right. And, bandwidth will be a lot better with the parallel dipoles. Sometimes, shortening a dipole can really make them kinda narrow. 73 and GL Tom W7WHY > Dan: > > I concur with Don's recommendation about using two dipoles on the same > feedline. I used this arrangement (with a third dipole for 20M) during my > Novice days and it worked well for me. The non-resonant dipoles aren't > even > seen by the one your operating on. Just leave enough wire at the ends of > each dipole for trimming. > > 73 de > Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40/80m dipole, David J. Sourdis - HK1A |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 87, Issue 76, Tom E Moore |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40/80m dipole, David J. Sourdis - HK1A |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 40/80m dipole, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |