Amen! And praise the Lord for the "delete" key...
Bob W7KD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen - W5IF" <W5IF@valornet.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.
>
> I thought this subject had been beaten to death. Lord please give these
> folks some sunspots.
>
> 73
> W5IF
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick Stealey
> Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 14:09
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.
>
>
>
>> Why introduce this into this thread? The models you mention do not
> resemble
>> the Cage dipole, so why?
>
> Hi Bill,
> I don't agree. In fact I believe the models I built DO STRONGLY resemble
> a
> cage,
> give the same benefit, without the physical difficulties of building a
> traditional cage.
> What is a traditional cage but several parallel wires, fed at the same
> point?
> They may be connected together at the far end, but that's not really
> necessary
> since the voltage there is the same for each element of the cage, so the
> individual wires can be separated with no effect on the antenna.
> An antenna experimenter may start with a single wire dipole, then add one
> wire
> in parallel with it, then additional ones to build a cage. Or (as I
> discovered) take
> the second wire and drop it down at a 10 degree angle and get nearly the
> same
> result. My 2nd model was three wires separated 1 meter apart, but I
> confess were not joined at the far end. However I believe that is a very
> strong resemblance to a traditional cage.
> Maybe I should put in my post with a different subject so those who are
> interested in discussing pure, 100 % tradional cage antennas, wouldn't be
> tainted by considering alternatives.
> But for those who would like to have
> - an antenna that covers 3500 to 3800 with a 2:1 SWR,
> - with extremely low cost and
> - less than an hours work, and
> - always wanted to have a cage,
> Then here it is.
>
> By the way, I happen to be one of those guys, like you, who hate to
> see off topic posts. In this case however, I believe my post was right
> on-topic. However I am going to do as I mentioned above and start a
> new thread, and invite anyone who wants to comment on or contribute to
> cage antenna alternatives to participate there.
>
> Rick K2XT
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Rediscover HotmailR: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry
> http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Mob
> ile1_042009
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|