Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.

To: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>, "Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited.
From: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:28:20 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Dan- If it means anything and will remove any blame he wants to heap on you, 
I can assure him (and you may  quote me) that your opinion did not influence 
me at all.  I knew all long that his "Engineering Analysis" was wrong. Did 
he say what kind of Engineers did the work?
Bill-W4BSG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
S N I P
that individual assures me that the gain claim
> for his company's antenna is truthful,  based on an engineering analysis,
> and he is concerned that my implication could be harmful to his business,
> given the truthful nature of his gain claims for his company's antenna.
>
> So I feel I should apologize for any implication that those who sell cage
> dipoles with with gain over dipoles are lying. I did not intend to
> misrepresent the truth or falsehood of the claims of others.
S N I P
> 73
> Dan
> 


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>