No Neil. If you tower falls within the FAA rule you must register your
tower BUT the FAA does make exceptions for just what you mentioned. That is
"surrounding terrain." In two instances, once in Medford and once in Coos
Bay, Oregon the FAA waved their tower height & lighting requirements and
sent me a letter to that effect. I got these when I O&O radio stations in
Oregon in the mid eighties and early nighties. Certainly doesn't mean they
will do it every time but depending on circumstances might be an option. In
my case it simply save cost of specialized painting and lighting
requirements. So fill out the forms and send them in. It's not a big deal.
Van, K7VS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil & Heather" <neil.goodell@verizon.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:58 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] tower at airport
> <The 1 foot in 100 is a rule to avoid registering the tower. It the
> proposed
> tower is above this rule, or 200 feet or higher it MUST be registered.
> Once
> registered (approved), the information is placed on the maps used by
> pilots
> to plan their flight so as to avoid obstacles such as towers.>
>
> Using TOWAIR, my proposed 60' tower at 45-54'-39.13" N, 72-15'-08.55"W
> ,ASL 550', is 90' to tall,interesting.
> But that 60' tower would still be 40 to 50' shorter than the ring of pine
> trees surounding the property.So does part 17(tower not taller than
> surounding objects) supercede all rules, or should I still notify the FAA
> ?
>
> Neil AE1P
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil & Heather" <neil.goodell@verizon.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:58 AM
Subject: [TowerTalk] tower at airport
> <The 1 foot in 100 is a rule to avoid registering the tower. It the
> proposed
> tower is above this rule, or 200 feet or higher it MUST be registered.
> Once
> registered (approved), the information is placed on the maps used by
> pilots
> to plan their flight so as to avoid obstacles such as towers.>
>
> Using TOWAIR, my proposed 60' tower at 45-54'-39.13" N, 72-15'-08.55"W
> ,ASL 550', is 90' to tall,interesting.
> But that 60' tower would still be 40 to 50' shorter than the ring of pine
> trees surounding the property.So does part 17(tower not taller than
> surounding objects) supercede all rules, or should I still notify the FAA
> ?
>
> Neil AE1P
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: 1/20/2007
> 10:31 PM
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|