To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Connectors |
From: | "Daron J. Wilson" <daron@wilson.org> |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:20:18 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
> NOT .. means "Universal High Frequency" > (Have heard others .. but it did NOT mean Ultra High Frequency --- no > way!) Do you have one shred of support for this bogus claim? Every reference I've checked on my bookshelf defines it as Ultra High Frequency, which it was at the time the definition was proposed. So...show me the money. A simple google search for the definition of UHF will show you many reputable resources defining it as Ultra High Frequency. Share the knowledge!! 73 N7HQR _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source, Cecil Moore |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Connectors, Richard M. Gillingham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Connectors, AA6DX - Mark |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Connectors, Richard M. Gillingham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |