Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated

To: <KI9A@aol.com>, <w4tv@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated
From: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:17:11 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
And, IMHO, well maybe not so humble,  people that get these no code licenses 
should have to sign /NC after their calls. I worked for mine, they should 
work for theirs.  This is an insulting downgrade of ham radio requirements 
driven by the equipment manufacturers.  I wonder where ARRL stands on this? 
I think I already know the answer.

Bob W6TR
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <KI9A@aol.com>
To: <w4tv@subich.com>
Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated


>
> In a message dated 12/16/2006 9:37:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> w4tv@subich.com writes:
>
> Those  who obtain a benefit without significant effort are not
> likely to value it  as highly as those who made a major effort.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That is the best line about this mess...I TOTALLY agree with this.
>
> 73-Chuck KI9A
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>