To: | Richard Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30 |
From: | david jordan <wa3gin@erols.com> |
Date: | Wed, 05 Nov 2003 10:15:21 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
One could argue that bending the element 90 degrees does not have the
effects you discibe as linear loading. Have you actually tried it? 73, dave wa3gin Richard Karlquist wrote: _______________________________________________Folding the element does little to reduce the performance. It looks hokie, but it's simple, light weight, more efficient than lumped inductance. The wires have to clear whats underneath but it's a See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30, Richard Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Yet another source of QRN..., Doug Rehman |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR 40/30, Richard Karlquist |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Re: 40m beam with wires dangling down, corneliuspaul |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |