[TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions")

To:	<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:	[TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions")
From:	K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date:	Thu Apr 17 18:11:29 2003

In a message dated 4/17/03 12:05:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
steve@oakcom.com writes:

> 
>  Where am I going wrong in this admittedly oversimplified model?
>  
>  --
>  Steve K8LX
>  

Steve, you are "going right"

Yuri

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), (continued) [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), Pete Smith [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), Dan Arney [TowerTalk] Re: Guying self-supporting towers, Bud Hippisley, K2KIR [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), Steve Maki [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters, Chuck Counselman [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), Pete Smith [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), Steve Maki [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com <= [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K7LXC@aol.com

Previous by Date:	[TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), on4kj
Next by Date:	[TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions "), K3BU@aol.com
Previous by Thread:	[TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com
Next by Thread:	[TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]