To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") |
From: | n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith) |
Date: | Wed Apr 16 22:10:28 2003 |
At 08:46 PM 4/16/03 -0400, K3BU@aol.com wrote: >That is nonsense! >If the guy wires can hold the load, the tower will be stressed less than if >self-supporting. Yuri, this is simply wrong. simple vector analysis will show you the vertical load guy wires apply to the tower as the lateral force increases. whether the tower can take it is a design decision made when the application -- i.e., guyed or unguyed -- is determined. 73, Pete N4ZR The World HF Contest Station Database was updated 11 April 03. Are you current? www.pvrc.org/wcsd/wcsdsearch.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Cal-Av EB-1 balun, Steve Jackson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Used Tower, Junk or Good find?, BobbyTrip@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), Dan Arney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |