To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") |
From: | K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com) |
Date: | Thu Apr 17 21:38:46 2003 |
In a message dated 4/17/03 3:36:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time, K3BU@aol.com writes: > Again there is no need to tension the guy wires as in properly > designed guyed tower, some slack is preferred. Huh? The TIA-222 Tower Standard obviously thinks differently. That's two. Three strikes and you're out. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TT ADMIN |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K7LXC@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters, K7LXC@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions"), K3BU@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] concrete, kce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |