Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[Towertalk] Lighting Protection and Roof Towers

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [Towertalk] Lighting Protection and Roof Towers
From: RedHaines@centurytel.net (Red)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:36:59 -0600
It sure is!  As is the other side of the dipole.  Some advocate an 
inductor between the two parts of a dipole to prevent static buildup 
between them and to facilitate designing a system to protect the house 
and equipment from lightning strikes on dipoles.

73 de WOØW

Mark Beckwith wrote:

>>if you
>>can make your antenna/tower look as much like ground as possible and
>>    
>>
>prevent
>  
>
>>any charge from building up on it, you are less likely to take a strike.
>>    
>>
>
>Does this mean that the side of a high dipole which is connected to the
>center conductor is a target?
>
>Mark, N5OT
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AN Wireless Self Supporting Towers at discounted prices, 
>See http://www.mscomputer.com 
>
>Wireless Weather Stations now $349.95. Call Toll Free, 
>888-333-9041 for additional information.
>_______________________________________________
>Towertalk mailing list
>Towertalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>  
>



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>