That plus the bandwidth of 160M antennas were probably taken into account in
the decision to put it at 1.840. Moving the FT8 frequency much higher would
shut a lot of the CW guys that like both modes.
73,
Bill WE5P
Comfortably Numb
> On Oct 9, 2020, at 19:48, Mail 10 <mail10@barefoothorse.com.au> wrote:
>
> I rarely see CW activity much above 1830 kHz. The only issue I see from time
> to time is SSB interference to the 1840 kHz FT8 channel.
>
> VK band is 1800 - 1875 kHz. If a particular mode were moved above 1900 kHz,
> some here would miss out. We would have to do what JA FT8 ops did until
> recently and operate split.
>
> Luke VK3HJ
>
>> On 10/10/2020 3:19 am, Ron Spencer via Topband wrote:
>> I enjoy low band dxing and contesting. And have an above average set up. All
>> that said, I get on when I want.....or not. Last I checked ham radio is
>> still a hobby not an obligation. Re FT8: My only gripe is its location on
>> 1840. PLENTY of room above 1900 so it wouldn't interfere with other modes.
>> 1840 was, I feel, a poor choice.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> N4XD
>>
>> Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
> _________________
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|