Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc

[<dj7ww@t-online.de>]

Of course I understand the topic.
Web sdrs have the worse receiving capabilities.
I see no reason at all to use one.

But you did not answer my question concerning the sdrs.
Please do, if possible with the links to them.

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: uy0zg [mailto:uy0zg@mksat.net] 
Sent: Samstag, 11. Januar 2020 22:15
To: peter.voelpel@t-online.de
Cc: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc


You Peter did not understand the topic.

Participants ( contests on 160 ?) from Eastern Europe use receivers in 
the USA, Japan and Australia.

They feel completely unpunished.


This is the main problem!

---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua

dj7ww@t-online.de ????? 2020-01-11 22:05:
> If my 160m receive would be as bad as with any web sdr I would not 
> contest
> on that band.
> Which web sdr is used from Eastern Europe?
> 
> 73
> Peter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com] 
> On
> Behalf Of uy0zg
> 
> Serious problems for topband are the use of WEB.SDR. Especially in
> Eastern Europe. The goal of such scammers is the highest places in
> popular contests at 160 meters.
> This problem is N1.

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector