I agree as well.
The problem for those chasing new ones is sometimes the fact that folks who
already worked, confirmed the entity that was accepted by DXCC Desk are still
calling and often stealing the chance from their fellow amateurs who need that
DX.
Generally they have the strongest signals and just are competing in their
Vanity Fair.
Another questionable idea is so called «DX Marathon» requiring to work the same
entity every year, month, week etc.
As for me, one DX QSO confirmed by QSL card and/or in LoTW and accepted by DXCC
Desk is enough.
We can work the same stations again and again in all kinds of topband contests
giving the points and multipliers to those who need them.
Good DX and the Happy New Year 2020.
>Среда, 8 января 2020, 5:27 +03:00 от Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>:
>
>I agree. After over 60 years if ham radio I got on this band semi-seriously
>only a few years ago with the goal of working my 9th DXCC band. With my modest
>station here in the depths of the AZ desert it is very difficult for me to work
>into EU or AF. Especially true when I have to compete with stations on the
>east
>coast or the mid-west who are telling the DX, "You're much stronger tonight
>that
>last night."
>
>Consequently, trying to be a gentleman on the gentleman's band, I often refrain
>from calling the usual Asian or S. Pacific suspects that are relatively easy to
>work, in deference to others to my north and east. If only this was a two-way
>arrangement.
>
>If it's any consolation, I worked JT1CO for the first time only last week.
>I've
>heard him many times but could never get through with my puny 500W.
>
>Wes N7WS
>
>
>On 1/7/2020 2:24 PM, Greg wrote:
>> No problem if you want to work G3YRO or any of the many other common
>> countries...but please don't get in a pile-up for a rare one that you have
>> already worked...like JT1CO. If no one is calling and you want to work him
>> again, no problem. There was an Italian station on the 160 chat this
>> morning who said he had worked JT1CO many times on 160 -- even with 100
>> watts. In contrast I've heard him twice in 10 years in Florida and then
>> only for a couple minutes. Still need it for the last zone on Topband.
>> Hopefully, 160 will still be known as the gentleman's band. 73, Greg-N4CC
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Topband < topband-bounces+n4cc=windstream.net@contesting.com > On
>> Behalf
>> Of Roger Kennedy
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 10:57 AM
>> To: topband@contesting.com
>> Subject: Topband: Musings on multiple 160m QSOs
>>
>>
>> Well you know I have said this several times before Steve . . so thanks for
>> clarifying.
>>
>> Like you, EVERY DX contact is a thrill to me (even after 50 years on the
>> band), no matter how many times I may have worked that station before.
>>
>> I actually think that MOST 160m DX-ers agree. After all, it takes a LOT of
>> effort to put up a decent 160m antenna (for Tx AND Rx) . . . if you only
>> used that to work NEW stations, you might only come on the band a handful of
>> times each year !
>>
>> Hopefully people WON'T now be afraid to call and work stations they have
>> worked many times before on 160 !
>>
>> 73 Roger G3YRO
>>
>_________________
>Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
--
73, Victor Goncharsky US5WE/K1WE (UW5W in VHF contests, ex UB5WE), P.E.
UARL Technical and VHF Committies
DXCC Honor Roll #1 (Mixed, Phone), 10BDXCC, 9BWAS, 5BWAZ, WAZ-160
DXCC card checker (160 meters).
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|