Pete,
Traditional wisdom is, if you have the choice of short or long radials, more
shorter ones are preferred over a few long ones. However, 50 60 foot radials
are not considered long for 160 meters. I have found that 50 to 60 radials
will do a great job. At least 30 is a good starting point. 73, Bob K3UL
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of N4ZR
Sent: Monday, September 2, 2019 3:08 PM
To: topband reflector <Topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Inverted L redux
More as an experiment and a thought-provoker than anything else, I've started
adding 50-60-foot, on-the-ground radials to my 135-foot inverted L. In the
latest incarnation I'm up to 4 radials. On my ancient MFJ-259B the lowest SWR
is 1.3:1 at 1825 KHz, with an R of 77. X=0 (the 259B doesn't give the sign of
j) from 1808 to1894, which I assume is roughly centered on the actual
cross-over point.
With my rudimentary knowledge of such things, I'm guessing that there remains
something on the order of 50 ohms of ground resistance to be reduced for
efficiency, through addition of radials. Question is, would I profit most by
adding another 4 50-60 foot radials, or 2 radials each 100-120 feet?
Comments appreciated.
--
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|