Although licensed for 60 years I'm a relative newby on topband. (I did work VE7
in 1959 but that's another story). I decided to semi-seriously take up the band
to acquire my 9th DXCC band award.
As I've described before, pardon the redundancy, I worked my first 70 entities
using an inverted-vee dipole with the apex at about 45 feet and the ends down
around six feet. Of course conventional wisdom says that this couldn't possibly
work for anything but local contacts. A year ago, I replaced the dipole with an
inverted-L, 55 feet vertical, the rest horizontal, over a skimpy radial field of
about (so far) 20 insulated radials each 55 feet long laying on the desert
dirt. I both transmit and receive on this antenna, as I did the dipole before
it. I've since worked 40+ stations, completing DXCC plus a few.
Perhaps I'm blessed with a relatively quiet location, although unlike some I'm
not miles from civilization, but not in a subdivision either. I have made zero
effort to silence noise sources in my house, but do work with the local co-op
power utility to silence obvious noise sources. (Their sleuth is a ham)
Although I'm considering an RX-only antenna, and it might be eyeopening, I'm not
yet convinced of that. Anything I would use on RX would probably have a broad
peak and get its noise rejection from the rear.
Examining where most of the unworked DX is from here (EU, ME and central AS) the
paths are mostly over the (noisy) continental land mass of NA (and the polar
region) at my SS or early evening. The null of any RX antenna pointing at these
areas would be looking at the sunlit Pacific Ocean. At my SR, the converse
would be true.
So all things considered, using only 500W (10dB too few according to one of my
friends), I already hear as well as I'm heard. My bigger obstacle is QRM from
the east. Nevertheless, I'm willing to try an RX antenna, if I can be convinced
it will be of benefit, so I'm open to suggestions.
Wes N7WS
On 12/19/2018 7:13 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
If your inverted L is any good at all it will suck as a receiving
antenna. This is one of the key things to accept about medium wave
but many casual 160 m. operators can't wrap their heads around it. A
flame throwing tx antenna will probably have a completely unacceptable
noise level on receive. Tx/rx reciprocity works on HF but not as well
on medum wave. Separate rx antenna(s) are mandatory. A
significant irritant on 160 are the operators with poor antennas that
hear great, therefore they expect to be heard equally well, and can't
be made to believe they are piss weak when they transmit.
Rob
K5UJ
_________________
Searchable Archives:http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|