Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Hi Z Antennas

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Hi Z Antennas
From: Dennis W0JX via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Dennis W0JX <w0jx@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:10:18 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I have had a Hi-Z four square up since early 2012. It is a very good system for 
my needs. I have adequate land - although it was necessary to put it out in the 
front yard to get it away from the TX antenna - for the 80 foot per side 
layout. I see 18 to 24 db front to rear rejection depending upon angle of 
signal arrival. My system is probably compromised by power lines that border 
two sides of my property. The Hi-Z is connected to the second RX in my K3 and 
is used in diversity mode on 160 and 80.

For main RX on the low bands I used to have two, 450 foot reversible beverages. 
However local noise sources have made those beverages almost unusable in the 
past 5 years. Hence I was forced to put up antennas which have excellent rear 
rejection. For that purpose, I installed three "dual flag" receive arrays. 
These are similar to DHDL rx antennas developed by George, AA7JV except that I 
use two flag loops instead of the half deltas.

The flag antennas (really simplified Waller flags) have excellent rear 
rejection and make the AC power line noise almost non-existent. If you purchase 
the Bev-Flex, I do recommend installing it as a EWE or FLAG. If you go with the 
Hi-Z two element, make sure there are no antennas or large metal objects in 
near by proximity or you won't get the receiving pattern you need.

73, Dennis W0JX
Milan, OH 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>