Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Capacitive vs. Inductive Matching of Inverted 'L'/'T'

To: "'160 reflector'" <Topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Capacitive vs. Inductive Matching of Inverted 'L'/'T'
From: "Clive GM3POI" <clive@gm3poi.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:02:34 -0000
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Tom the name comes from the inductance used on Yagi's as a Hairpin match
simply because it looks like one. When used on a vertical it simply goes
from the bottom of the insulated conductor to ground.   Are you using a PI-
L network in the PA for a start. I would worry about harmonic content as a
separate issue to the best way to configure  the L or T. Again a simple coax
stub could fix the problem.
73 Clive GM3POI 

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom
Boucher
Sent: 03 September 2018 18:16
To: 160 reflector
Subject: Topband: Capacitive vs. Inductive Matching of Inverted 'L'/'T'

I used to use a slightly shortened 'L' with a small inductor at the base
until I was told by LA5HE that he could hear me on 80 as well as 160!
Using capacitor matching forms a low pass network which will reduce harmonic
radiation. The inductor method forms a high pass L-network.

BTW, why is it called a 'hairpin' inductor? Looks nothing like a hairpin, or
does it?

73,
Tom G3OLB
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>