Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles

To: topBand List <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles
From: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 02:07:13 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Luke, 


What I should have said is that propagation towards much lower latitudes 
doesn't suffer from the polarization related issues that high latitude 
paths suffer from. 


My thinking suffers from northern hemisphere biases! 


73 
Frank 
W3LPL 

----- Original Message -----

From: "VK3HJ" <vk3hj_luke@barefoothorse.com.au> 
To: "topBand List" <topband@contesting.com> 
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 5:04:13 AM 
Subject: Re: Topband: 160m polarization and elevation angles 



-----Original Message----- 
From: donovanf@starpower.net 

"160 meter long distance propagation is much more efficient to the south " 


Do you mean "between higher latitudes and lower latitudes"? 

To my south there are only penguins, and Tasmanians. 

Luke VK3HJ 
_________________ 
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband 

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>