Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground"

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Modeling "Ground"
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Reply-to: Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:38:12 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
In reality, NEC4 can produce quite accurate results when modeling buried radial wires and groundwave propagation losses along a real earth path -- as long as earth conductivity is known for that path and operating frequency.

The link below shows the value of the groundwave E-field at a range of ~28 miles produced by a NEC4 model of an AM broadcast station. Even though NEC does not account for earth curvature, this groundwave path is short enough for that error to be negligible.

The NEC field is rather a close match to the value shown for this set of conditions when using the FCC's groundwave propagation curves for this frequency, radiated power and earth conductivity (see the table at the bottom of the graphic).

http://s20.postimg.org/tkg5hcfsd/WLS_NEC_vs_FCC_Field.jpg

R. Fry, CPBE
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>