Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Beverage guidance needed

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Beverage guidance needed
From: Garry Shapiro <garry@ni6t.com>
Reply-to: garry@ni6t.com
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:22:12 -0800
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I live in a redwood forest and canyon and run two relatively short 2-wire Beverages through the thick woods. In fact I have never had any better situation to contend with. Not only do the wires hang on trees but they change altitude over rough terrain over their lengths. There is no room for a radial field for a TX vertical and not much separation between antennas. One Bev even includes a dogleg from having to reroute it over a neighbor's property. "Effective" is a judgment word and in the eye of the beholder, but I have 231 counters in the log on 160. Don't get me wrong, it has taken over 20 years to get there, but I got there.

I have always believed any Beverage was better than no Beverage--a truth imparted to me two decades ago by KN6J, an early local achiever of topband DXCC. Bevs are cheap to construct and easy to repair, which is a good thing because the forest kills them frequently. Yes, try it---what is there to lose?

I believe K9YC has had a similar experience.

Garry, NI6T

On 2/14/2015 9:35 AM, Charles Yahrling wrote:
Hey guys,

I'm doing some winter antenna daydreaming based on Low Band DXing and other
sources.   Is
it safe to say that an E-W  Beverage or a BOG would be ineffective if the
wire were run through a wooded area,
with or without a narrow lane cut for it? or is "try it and find out" the
favored approach?

My only semi site would be N-S along a property line along a road, directly
across from power lines on conventional poles.

E-W,  reversible, would favor western europe and western US.  My lot is a 5
acre wooded trapezoid so 500-600 feet would be
max practical length.

tnx in advance

73, chuck


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>