To: | Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Skywave vs. Earth Conductivity |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:54:10 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Rich, Based a number of others' experiences that I've read, a vertical that is very close to the ocean has a significant advantage to paths over the ocean, vs. a similar antenna installation that's only a mile (or less) inland. I forget the details, but this was discussed at length on this reflector last year. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net> wrote: > There is no visible/useful difference in the radius to that contour over > the ocean than over the land. > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Skywave vs. Earth Conductivity, K1FZ-Bruce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Skywave vs. Earth Conductivity, Mike Waters |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Skywave vs. Earth Conductivity, Grant Saviers |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Skywave vs. Earth Conductivity, Mike Waters |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |