Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: [time-nuts] Minicircuits 10% discount in December

To: "'Tom W8JI'" <w8ji@w8ji.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: [time-nuts] Minicircuits 10% discount in December
From: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:59:28 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
 I had good results with a matching transformer for 50-800 ohms for a
terminated KAZ receiving loop, that was wound on a binocular core of 73
material. Very modest turn count. I wound it as a conventional transformer
with wire-wrap wire to accommodate the small core. The loop worked VERY well
on 160, 80, 40 and 30m. I could hear lots on 160 that I hadn't even known
was there before putting up the loop! It was a huge help on 160 on my small
lot. The loop was terminated with an 820 ohm carbon composition resistor.

73,
Charlie, K4OTV



-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom W8JI
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 7:20 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: [time-nuts] Minicircuits 10% discount in December

Anyone with proper test equipment can measure and verify what I say below is
absolutely true.

I'd hate to see anyone accept this information as factual or accurate:

> The single turn resonance of this core is around 10 MHz, with a Z at 
> resonance of about 120 ohms. Like any other ferrite core, winding 
> turns will increase L as N squared, increase C as N, thus moving the 
> resonance down in frequency.  I'd guess that 8 turns would move the 
> resonance fairly close to 160M with Z in the range of 4-5K ohms. The catch
is that the i.d.
> is pretty small, so the choke would need to be wound with something 
> like one pair out of CAT5 cable.

10 MHz is the core "resonance", not the combination of winding inductance
and winding capacitance. Somewhere around 10 MHz the core, no matter how
many turns are wound, crosses from having any inductive effects to
capacitive. This is because the core becomes diamagnetic, not because of the
winding.

The dominant impedance anywhere above 2-3 MHz is resistive.

If you wind one pass around the center (out and back to start through both
holes) you'll find the reactive sign of core impedance crosses over to
capacitance at around 10 MHz. If you wind five turns, it remains about the
same. The capacitance effect does not matter much because core resistance
dominates. As turns are added, the resistance shunting the winding increases
with only a slight shifting of apparent "resonance".

It is the resistance that dominates and parallels the windings. The loading
effect can be minimized by proper winding techniques.

This core (or any 73 material) reaches X = R, or Q = 1, at around 2.5 MHz. 
In other words, at around 2.5 MHz, one pass (through the hole and back to
start) is about 75 +j75 ohms, where inductance and resistance are equal. You
want at least a two-pass (out and around and back two times) 50-75 ohm
winding for 160 meters, and it will be good well beyond 30 MHz.

> Fair-Rite considers this a suppression part, not an inductive part, 
> although it is widely used for winding transformers for MF RX antennas.
> The laws of physics don't change with what we call something, so this 
> will be a fairly lossy transformer.

The last sentence is incorrect. A typical primary-secondary modest impedance
broadband transformer using that core, with minimal attention to winding
style, has about 1 dB loss at 50 MHz. Loss decreases with a reduction in
frequency, and is a fraction of a dB on 2 MHz.
Without special care, this transformer material is easily much less than .5
dB loss across HF.

With higher power you might have to move to a lower loss core, or with very
high impedances you may want to choose a core that allows the winding to
become resonant, but characterizing this core as "fairly lossy" (whatever
that really means) is not correct unless we consider 1/2 dB "fairly lossy". 
Generally, 1/2 dB (10% power loss) core loss becomes worrisome with a core
this size at about 10-20 watts. At 20 watts the core will be dissipating
about 2 watts on HF, less at the low end of HF or on 160 meters.

At higher power, the core loss over the operating frequency range has to
decrease or the size increase. The ALS1306, for example, uses a stack of 43
mix cores just like this style for the input transformer. That transformer
has less than .2 dB loss from 1.8 to 100 MHz, and safely handles well over
100 watts.

For receive, and if extreme impedances are not required, the 73 mix core is
good to 60 MHz or so.

> For RX transformers, it may not matter (and the low Q may even help), 
> but don't be surprised when you see the added resistance beyond what 
> the turns ratio predicts. :)

You will see a loading effect in high impedance applications, because even
several thousand ohms core resistance shunting a winding will "load" a 400
ohm or higher resistance load.

Broadband transformers almost always use a core material that is well beyond
magnetic effects at the top end of the frequency range. That is what makes
them broadband.

73 Tom 

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>