Tom there are many other things in the mix here. Five houses within 30-40 feet,
Hi-Z receive antenna within 10 feet of transmit antennas, three other wire
antennas sharing the same trees and air space. And yes the old L is still there
at about 60 feet away. I don’t think I'm the only person in this situation
however. I will either detune or take down the old L. Thanks for your patience!
-Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
To: "Joe Galicic" <galicic@comcast.net>
Cc: "List, TopBand" <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:45:13 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Broadband Inverted L
>
> I now notice much better receive and transmit performance than before.
> Before I added the radials the old L was louder in certain directions.
> That's not the case any more. The new L is louder now regardless of
> direction. So I'm heading in the right direction. I was able to work 3 new
> DX entities on 160 including Italy with only 100 watts CW. The DX was
> about 1-2 S units louder on the new L.
>
> Thanks for all of the helpful suggestions !! It's not easy trying to put
> up an efficient antenna for 160 on a small lot !
>
Hi Joe,
Do I understand this correctly? You have both inverted L's up only 40 feet
apart, with one of them running directly over a tree??
Unless you are detuning unused antenna, anything you observe is an unknown
mix of things. Are you detuning the unused antenna?
How many other things are in the mix?
If it is just one Inverted L, then how are you comparing levels between
them? You can't compare levels with only one antenna up at a time.
I don't think it is possible to reach conclusions or offer advice about
systems before understanding the entire layout.
73 Tom
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|