Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: BCB interference ?

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: BCB interference ?
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:21:29 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On Mon,9/22/2014 6:50 AM, Ed Stallman wrote:
Has anyone used this High Pass Filter ? http://www.dunestar.com/store/160-Meter-Highpass-Filter-pid-8.html

The spec for this filter is ambiguous. Is the -40dB at all frequencies below 1.6 MHz, or at 1 MHz? BIG difference. OTOH, the Dunestar filters are decent for the price.


I found I have a 25KW AM 1520 Khz BC transmitter 12 miles from me , is that close enough to interfere with me receiving weak signal DX on the top Band ? I do hear some wide band hash 1837 to 1840 !

That may be because they are transmitting digital radio. No filter will remove that -- it's part of their sidebands.


Thought I would asking before placing an order, not sure how what to look for with BCB interference ?

A year or so ago, I reviewed a bunch of bandpass filter sets designed for contesters. I also measured an ICE BCB filter (160M highpass). k9yc.com/BandpassFilterSurvey.pdf The pdf includes a link to pdfs of the VNWA data. I measured the filters that I either owned or could borrow from local NCCC members. Sorry -- the ICE BCB was the only one I had access to.

I didn't put a marker at 1.5 MHz (I would have, but I was out of markers), but eyeballing it without a marker, I'd say that all of these filters (except the ICE419Bs) would be down by at least 15 dB at 1.5 MHz. The ICE BCB was about -16 dB at 1.5 MHz. 15 dB would reduce that 25kW station to 800W. Maybe enough, maybe not. For more rejection, you'll need one of the W3NQN designs that Array Solutions sells. And remember that NO filter will touch any sideband trash that the station puts on 160M.

73, Jim K9YC




_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>