I have the zero five 55 foot antenna which was custom built to actually be a
full sized 80 meter antenna. It was affordable and has stood up well on a very
windy mountain top. Performance is, of course, no different than a 65 foot
wire…. if you had trees to support the latter.
On Jun 3, 2014, at 1:43 AM, Ray Benny <rayn6vr@cableone.net> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Can you find or provide more info on these 80m zero-five verticals? What
> does zero-five mean or stand for?
>
> I though about using relays to switch in/out the top loading wires for
> 160m, but computed the voltage to be over 10 KV. Vacuum relays to handle
> that voltage are very expensive. Then there is the issue of protecting them
> from harsh WX.
>
> Ray,
> N6VR
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/2/2014 6:07 PM, John Kaufmann wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps top loading would be somewhat more efficient on 160,
>>> but it would be difficult electrically and mechanically to switch out top
>>> loading on 80.
>>>
>>
>> Not as difficult as you might think. Certainly worth some modeling. Add a
>> 80M trap at the top between the vertical and horizontal portions. Below 80M
>> that circuit would look inductive, which adds loading on 160. In the model,
>> play with values for the trap and the top wires to maximize efficiency. My
>> guess it that might be good for another dB or two.
>>
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|