W0AIH has a Rhombic, and it is pretty amazing. Mostly used on 20.
Its quieter than the stack, and its louder. Steerable, but NOT
rotateable :-)
Installing one is NOT a simple task. Took Paul a few tries to figure
out how to hang it. Its up about 100 feet, and requires a significant
amount of real estate. I could not imaging what it would take to make
one for 160, buts its a safe bet that a 4-square will be a lot easier
to install/require less real estate. Paul has a 4-square for 160
among other antennas for Topband.
Tom - VE3CX
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Shoppa, Tim <tshoppa@wmata.com> wrote:
> Anybody on this list have a Rhombic for 160M?
>
> W1AW used to use one for bulletins and code practice on 160M but I think it
> came down years ago (1989?)
>
> I seem to recall pics in CQ of a big California desert DX'er who had what was
> essentially a radial array of rhombics for maybe 160M or 80M.
>
> Tim N3QE
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Grant
> Saviers
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:03 AM
> To: ZR
> Cc: Gary@ka1j.com; topband@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Inv-L Joy
>
> Posted on towertalk yesterday was the link to the free download of the
> 1952 text Radio Antenna Engineering
> http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/edmund-laport/radio-antenna-engineering/ebook/product-17560294.html
>
>
> Some fascinating stuff since much of the focus is high power
> broadcasting LF/HF and point to point reliable RF links with high gain
> HF wire antennas. (many pictures of amazing arrays). A quick peruse
> found in a later chapter how to build high power non-inductive
> terminations for rhombics etc. Make an open wire feeder of the needed Z
> from iron or stainless wire and as long as the db's you wish to absorb
> and with wire heavy enough to handle the current. Clever stuff,
> invented when HF was a primary long distance communications technology.
> The formulas are there for resistivity and ferromagnetic losses.
>
> Of course some of the content is now pretty irrelevant since we have
> cheap great coax, ferrite, and NEC software and a billion times the
> worlds 1952 total computing power on every desktop.
>
> Grant KZ1W
>
>
> On 7/25/2013 8:17 AM, ZR wrote:
>> On a side note WD-1A conductors are a copper/cadmium alloy; whatever
>> that means in RF resistance. Fine for a Beverage but what is the loss?
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
>> To: <topband@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:22 AM
>> Subject: Re: Topband: Topband Inv-L Joy
>>
>>
>>> Had a more difficult time getting the antenna up there this time. The
>>> first spud snapped away from the fishing line & in the dense thicket
>>> I was unable to find where it landed. Had to make another & the
>>> mosquitos were so thick they posted a LUAU sign on my forehead.
>>>
>>> Till I get something better I retrieved my WD-1A military field phone
>>> wire that was left out in the marsh as my old beverage wire. and
>>> after a comedy of errors I finally got the antenna up.
>>>
>>> I was earlier getting a SWR of 1.1 on 160 before and now am getting
>>> 1.1 on 1.74365 MHZ
>>>
>>> 1.74365mhz
>>> R=51 X= 6,7,8
>>> swr 1.1
>>>
>>> At the desired frequency to match the antenna I've aimed for 1.8MHZ
>>> here's the information I was able to get at my desired frequency:
>>> 1.8025 mhZ
>>> Coax loss 6.3db
>>> C=4193 XC=21
>>> L=1.970 X1=21
>>> r=41 x=21 swr 1.6
>>>
>>> So this is what the antenna is giving me at this moment. I need to
>>> get back down and add the broken wire to the radial bed and I should
>>> also trim some length to bring my values to 1.1 at 1.025MHz.
>>>
>>> Given the info above from the MFJ 259B any idea how much I might
>>> nibble off and more, is there anything in this info that tells me I
>>> should look to do anything differently?
>>>
>>> Hopefully the coax loss will be mitigated by a friend bringing me
>>> 350' of hardline. Can't wait!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gary
>>> KA1J
>>> _________________
>>> Topband Reflector
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3209/6019 - Release Date: 07/25/13
>>>
>>
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector
>>
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
_________________
Topband Reflector
|