Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: RX splitter - ground common or not?

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: RX splitter - ground common or not?
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:10:07 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
The only thing I disagree with about Tom's advice is that, with the exception of a VERY large string of #73 beads (at least 100 beads), beads are useless on HF, and even those are not very useful at 2 MHz.

Advice like that must assume some ridiculous amount of common mode impedance being driven by extreme voltages. As a result, the advice misleads people about the requirements of a CM choke.

Attenuation added by beads, or any series CM impedance, depends on the common mode impedance at the insertion point. The beads, or any series impedance, are part of a system with the path impedance outside the added series isolation.

Let's say we have a common 10-foot long lead inside the shack, between two pieces of somewhat well-grounded gear, driven by a 100 mV noise voltage source. To keep it simple, let's assume that path impedance is 20 j0 ohms. CM current would be 5 Ma. This is reasonable according to measurements made here with a nasty SMPS I have.

If we added a single 1 inch long piece of 73 material, we would add 100 ohms or so additional impedance to the path. Current would now be .1/120 = 0.83 mA, instead of .1/20 = 5 mA. This is almost 16 dB attenuation from a single bead!!

Now there can be extreme examples where we might need 100's of beads to produce a significant change, but those cases are much more effectively solved by the addition of a ground or altering of a cable's length. Those cases would be specific to very special cases, and not likely at all to appear in a receiving cabling system. The problem in life comes in when we focus on extreme examples as rules, when they uncommon cases.

Let's look at an uncommon case.

Let's assume we have a half wave of cable with a shield surge impedance of hundreds of ohms to earth, and zero external loss resistance at cable ends or along the cable. We try to add beads in the exact center. Now we have two 1/4 wave transmission lines in series at each side of the beads, so the beads are at a point where the impedance is infinite. Now no matter how many beads we add, the common mode does not change.

This shows why there has to be some rational tempering of extremes we pick when we tell people what is necessary to solve a problem.

There is a practical litmus test sense to the notion we might commonly need hundreds of beads.

If such was a general case, very few of us would be successful adding beads to anything. Most people see very large effects even with small numbers of beads, even the WRONG beads, because the series impedance of a system is generally pretty low. This would especially be true on lower bands between pieces of desk equipment. Common mode impedance HAS to be reasonably low at source ends, or common mode current would not be an issue! The violation of this would be a very long transmission line with high shield to surroundings impedance and low loss, or a source driving the cable with hundreds of volts. In that case it would be better to fix or alter the system, rather than purchase and install hundreds or thousands of beads.

73 Tom
_______________________________________________
Remember the PreStew coming on October 20th.  http://www.kkn.net/stew for more 
info.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>