| To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal |
| From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 May 2012 21:30:09 -0500 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
You don't need 120 radials. The optimum radial length is shown on the chart at http://www.w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html 73, Mike www.w0btu.com > "Radio Antenna Engneerng" by EDMOUND LAPORT say's a system off 120 radial > wires spaced 3 degrees "AND HAVNG A LENGTH OF ABOUT ONE-HALF WAVELENGTH", > approaches the conditon of a perfectly ... > _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal, vk3pa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal, vk3pa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal, Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |