| To: | Edward Swynar <gswynar@durham.net>, Robert LChortek <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>, topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: "Linear Loading" & 160-Meters |
| From: | Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:44:41 -0800 (PST) |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> From: Chortek, Robert L <Robert.Chortek@berliner.com>
> Subject: Re: Topband: "Linear Loading" & 160-Meters
> To: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>, topband@contesting.com
> Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 12:15 PM
> Hi Ed,
[snip]
> Another thought, why not use top loading instead?
>
> 73,
>
> Bob/AA6VB
There you go. Top loading is the preferred method in nearly every instance.
73,
Mike Waters
W0BTU
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: Amplifier question, James Rogers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: KG4ED - slim?, Thorvaldur Stefansson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: "Linear Loading" & 160-Meters, Chortek, Robert L |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: "Linear Loading" & 160-Meters, K4SAV |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |