To: | "Ian Keyser" <ian.keyser@btopenworld.com>,<topband@contesting.com>, "Charles Bibb" <zedkay@bellsouth.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation |
From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:56:43 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> That's reassuring Tom..... could not several nosie cancellers in series do > the job formultiple noise sources from different directions... No. 1.) The MFJ noise canceller, while the best on the market **at this moment of time**, is a marginal design for IM dynamic range and noise figure. I wouldn't cascade a series of them. 2.) The sense antennas would have to be close to each noise source if the noise arrived from different directional angles. Each sense antenna would be required to NOT hear any noise from other noise sources. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: My Apologies to All, charles Lewis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Adjusting the MFJ-1026, Tod |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation - sound examples, Tod |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation, Charles Bibb |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |