To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: 1/4 versus 1/2 wave vert. |
From: | mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:09:25 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
all this vertical antenna on the top of a hill talk is scarring me. i have the same problem, and i plan to put up a YCCC double L, an antenna not heard about on this reflector in quite a while. during the CQWW this last November, i used an inverted L (50 feet of it vertical) with two drooping 130 foot radials. not much of an antenna, in my estimation. mike w7dra _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 1/4 versus 1/2 wave vert., KZurawski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: RM-11305, David Gilbert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 1/4 versus 1/2 wave vert., KZurawski |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: 1/4 versus 1/2 wave vert., w4dlz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |